Charles Taylor Dismisses United Nations Expert Report on Sierra Leone As “Disgraceful,” Says Report Is At The Heart Of The Case Against Him

For the whole of this week, Mr. Taylor has been responding to allegations made against him in a 2000 United Nations Expert Panel Report that he was involved in fueling the conflict in Sierra Leone through diamond and arms trade with Sierra Leonean rebel forces. The UN report reinforces prosecution allegations against Mr. Taylor that he supported the rebels in Sierra Leone through the supply of arms and ammunition in return for diamonds. Mr. Taylor dismissed the report as “disgraceful” and full of  “disinformation,” as he refuted all its allegations against him. Mr. Taylor said that the report made recommendations that not only hurt him, but punished Liberia.  This, Mr. Taylor told Special Court for Sierra Leone judges this week, was a “travesty of justice” and was at the heart of the whole case against him.

“This report actually is at the heart of this case and because of the way this report is written, together with the level of disinformation in it, it puts us in a bad position because it talks about diamonds, arms and training bases in Liberia. This is the basis of the case that has not been subject to legal scrutiny,” Mr. Taylor said.

The report, which Mr Taylor dismissed as biased against him in his testimony this week, alleged that Mr. Taylor received diamonds from two key rebel commanders in Sierra Leone: Ibrahim Ba, a Senegalese rebel commander who worked with Revolutionary United Front (RUF) rebels, and Johnny Paul Koroma, leader of the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC), a group of soldiers who overthrew the government of President Ahmed Tejan Kabbah in May 1997. The AFRC joined forces with the RUF rebels but they were forcefully removed from power by West African peacekeepers in February 1998. Mr. Taylor denied receiving diamonds from any of these individuals.

“I never had a business relationship with Ibrahim Ba. I have never collaborated with Ba for any sale of diamonds. There has never been a business relationship with Ba. None whatsoever. There are no documents to prove this. I don’t recall  any evidence that mentioned diamonds taken from Johnny Paul Koroma,” Mr. Taylor said.

The report also accused Mr. Taylor of having representatives in Kono and Tongo Fields in Sierra Leone, where the RUF rebels mined diamonds. Mr. Taylor denied having any representative in any of these places.

“I don’t know who they are talking about but I never had any representative anywhere,” Mr. Taylor told the judges.

According to the report, “this trade [diamond trade with the RUF] cannot be conducted without high level government involvement.” Denying his government’s involvement in the diamond trade with RUF rebels, Mr. Taylor told the court that “the nature of the diamond trade then and now did not require any government involvement. This is the case not only in Liberia. Tourists buy diamonds,” he said.

Mr. Taylor referenced that even though the United States has a fence separating its border with Mexico, that has not stopped drug cartels from transporting drugs into the United States. “Why do they expect Liberia to detect little stones coming to the country? It is insulting,” he said.

In describing the report, Mr. Taylor said that he raised alarms when he found out who was appointed as the reporting expert.  When Ian Smillie–who in a prior report had accused Mr. Taylor of involvement in diamond-for-arms trade in Sierra Leone– was named an expert, Mr. Taylor wrote a letter to the UN Secretary General questioning Mr. Smillie’s appointment. These concerns, Mr. Taylor said, were ignored by the UN and Mr. Smillie remained on the panel.

Mr. Smillie has already testified as an Expert Witness for the Special Court for Sierra Leone’s prosecution against Mr. Taylor.

“I had concerns about  people who had made allegations against Liberia being on the panel. You have already prejudiced the report by doing that,” Mr. Taylor said.

Mr. Taylor accused Great Britain and the United States of manipulating the findings of the report by putting pressure on Mr. Smillie, who was their own nominee on the panel.

“Britain and America are bringing the pressure. We know that the pressure is coming on Smillie because of the interest,” Mr. Taylor said. “I am confronted with these people who have already made those allegations  even before the panel report is out.”

It was no surprise therefore, Mr. Taylor said, that when the report came out, he was accused of active involvement in the provision of financial and military support to the rebels in return for diamonds. Mr. Taylor said that while these allegations were made against him, Britain and the United States failed to provide any “tangible evidence” of his involvement in Sierra Leone.

Mr. Taylor’s defense counsel, Courtenay Griffiths, also this week read portions of the book “Intervention in Africa” written by former United States Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Herman Cohen. In this book, a whole chapter is dedicated to the conflict in Liberia from the late 1980s to the 1990s. Mr. Cohen states in the book that the United States government, through its Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), provided support to Mr. Taylor’s National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL) rebel group. In his response, Mr. Taylor confirmed that his NPFL indeed received assistance from the United States.

“We were given some very high power technical radios by the embassy [United States], by the CIA at the time, that we used for rapid communications, that we could call almost any where in the world  and get to anybody that we wanted to get to on the ground,” Mr. Taylor said.

He explained that the assistance from the United States government was given to the NPFL as a deal to protect United States facilities in Liberia.

Mr. Taylor also accused the United States of providing similar support to other rebel groups in Liberia.

On Wednesday, Mr. Taylor accused the UN of ignoring the good work he did to facilitate a peaceful end to the conflict in Sierra Leone. He said that any fair report would have pointed out that he made significant contributions to take the RUF rebels to the negotiating table. The report, Mr. Taylor said “does not present the whole truth. There is not one mention of my contribution towards peace in Sierra Leone. This report is not fair, it is fickle and should not stand.”

Mr. Taylor told the court that when the report was published in 2000, his government in Liberia sent an immediate response to the UN Secretary General in which they tried to put the record straight. “We were furious and we did not hesitate to respond immediately. The government put a team together and we responded,” he said.

On Thursday, Mr. Taylor said that for almost a decade, the international community saw his role as one which fueled Sierra Leone’s civil conflict through gun running and drug smuggling, and that nothing he did could change this impression and Liberia suffered because of it.

“They had made up their minds, it really did not matter whatever I did,” Mr. Taylor told the judges when responding to international community allegations against him that he provided support to RUF rebels in Sierra Leone.

Mr. Taylor told the judges that in after the release of the UN Expert Report on Sierra Leone in 2000, accusing him of providing support to the RUF rebels, the United Kingdom, through its ambassador Jeremy Greenstock, proposed sanctions against Liberia at the UN Security Council. As a condition to lift the sanctions against Liberia, Ambassador Greenstock said that Liberia “needed to take urgent steps to stop support for the RUF and the trafficking of diamonds and arms to and from Sierra Leone.”

Economic Community Of West African States (ECOWAS) leaders, Mr. Taylor said, asked for a delay of the sanctions “so Liberia could take steps to address the concerns in the report in two months.”

Despite this plea from ECOWAS leaders, the UN Security Council went ahead and voted for sanctions against Liberia. “Sometimes, regional response does not matter. When one of these big countries want to do something, they will do it.”

As a condition to lift sanctions, Mr. Taylor said that the UN asked him to address the following concerns:

1. Expel all RUF members from Liberia

2. Stop all military and financial support for the RUF

3. Stop the importation of diamonds from Sierra Leone

4. Freeze all RUF assets in Liberia

5. Ground all Liberian aircraft

To address these issues, Mr. Taylor said that he gave a 72-hour ultimatum to all RUF personnel to leave Liberia. Mr. Taylor said that even RUF commander Sam Bockarie, who had relocated to Liberia with the approval of the international community, had to leave for the Ivory Coast with a handful of his followers. The bulk of the followers that Sam Bockarie took with him to Liberia when he left Sierra Leone in 1999 had to stay in Liberia because they had now become Liberian citizens and were part of Mr. Taylor’s Anti Terrorist Unit (ATU). He said he therefore saw no need to ask them out of the country. Mr. Taylor said that Sam Bockarie had become a “center of allegations and was bringing harm to the Liberian republic” and so he had no option but to ask him to get out of the country.

On the other conditions raised  by the UN, including stopping all support for the RUF, Mr. Taylor said there was no need to respond,  as he had not been providing any support for the RUF. He said that he took steps to stop the importation of diamonds from Sierra Leone and even asked for international support to monitor the Sierra Leone-Liberia border but he did not receive any such support. Mr. Taylor also said he took steps to check if RUF members had any assets in Liberia which needed to be frozen but he found none.  Mr. Taylor said he further grounded all aircraft that was registered in Liberia.

Mr. Taylor also told the judges this week that the United States, under the presidency of George H. Bush issued an executive order on May 22 2001 which declared that Liberia posed an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign interest of the United States.” Responding to a question as to what US interest Liberia could have posed a threat to, Mr Taylor said that “we did not know what US interest in the region was. We were as stunned and could not understand. We believed they had economic and military interest in West Africa.”

Mr. Taylor said that he took the US executive order to mean a call for “regime change and a declaration of war against Liberia.”

He said he saw all of these as unfair steps taken against him and the people of Liberia. “This whole thing is couched that Liberia is sitting on a time bomb. Everything could be raised to act against Liberia,” he said.

Mr. Taylor is responding to allegations that he had control over RUF rebels in Sierra Leone and that in return for diamonds, he provided arms and ammunition for the rebels which they used to cause mayhem on the people of Sierra Leone. He is presently testifying as a witness in his own defense.

Mr. Taylor’s testimony continues on Monday.


  1. I’d like a bit more information on how Charles Taylor brought the RUF to the negotiating table. I don’t believe that bringing a party to the negotiating table is the major contribution to the process that Taylor is making it out to be. There were plenty of other parties brokering a peace deal, and I personally didn’t see much involvement by Taylor at this time. More explanation please.
    Lots of generalising here. I need more.

    1. Fought in Sierra Leone

      It don’t matter how big of a role Mr. Taylor played. The only thing that matter is Mr. Taylor established his links to the RUF as peaceful purposes. This adds doubt about the prosecution version of Mr. Taylor’s relationship to the RUF. Any additional information on how he did it, should be discussed in a history book.

    2. bringing two confused parties to a negotiating table is not a major contribution to a peace process?oh my God i don’t believe that,i think that alone eliminates all other conerns u have honestly

  2. The only thing disgraceful is Charles Taylor denial of what he knows and I know he did. If Charles Taylor could be as brutal as he was in Liberia, use children soldiers and get them killed in his senseless “power-trip-rampage”, then i don’t doubt one bit that he was capable of doing what he is accused of doing in Sierra Leone. Liberia was in a civil war, hardly any money was coming into the economy, sanctions and embargo had been placed on Liberia yet some how guns kept on coming in Liberia. Guns, big ones small ones missile launchers, etc… where did they come from, how did it enter Liberia? I believe Charles Taylor used the blood diamonds that was afforded to him thanks to Mr. Foday Sankoh to supply NPFL with an abundance of weapons to kill innocent civilians and to kill each other. Charles Taylor is disgraceful for even uttering such a statement!
    P.S: thanks for this website. You really update it daily and I know that this is the only place i find a very accurate chronological order of events happening in the hague daily to thanks!

    1. Hi Liberianactivist07,

      Thanks for your kind words about the site. We are glad you find it useful. Any suggestions from readers on how to improve it are always welcome too.


    2. Liberianactivist07,

      It appears brother that you resent the war, those who fuel it and the appalling toll it places on the civillian population. Especially during the Liberian crises, guns enter the country through lot of means including those of Taylor. LURD, MODEL, ULIMO, LPC, LDC, you name it they had it. I do not believe the importation was limited to the NPFL, and correct me please.

      But I want to take the infiltration of arms into Liberia at a higher level. Documents have surfaced, and thanks to this trial, that the American and British Governments also infiltrated arms into Liberia to facilitate campaigns of some of the factions mentioned supra.

      Brother, my point is we should not be emotional about Taylor and his NPFL but objective so that we can get the root cause of our problems and attempt to address them.

    3. Liberianactivist07

      I think every men should be accountable for his action and President Taylor is accused of doing some horrible crimes (and responsible for horrible crimes against his own people). But the law is not made to serve as a haven for revenge. It’s serve as a place for justice, which require a process. The law is not based on “what you think you know”. It’s what you can prove without a reasonable doubt. Yes, it’s bad when the law protects the guilty but it’s created to protect the innocent and every man is innocent until proven guilty. The moment we start letting anger and “past track records” overwhelm the basic structure of the criminal justice system. No one will be safe from being convicted on false accusations. We all want justice but not at the expense of “redefining” the criminal justice system.
      I’m not to convinced about Mr. Taylor receiving diamonds from Mr.Foday Sankoh. Mr. Taylor made a valid point in his letter to the Secretary-General (27 AUGUST 2009 Page 27846 & 27847) “It is reasonable to assume that if indeed I was or am involved in the sale of any diamonds, for that matter, the money trail would inevitably lead to me”. Additionally Mr. Taylor voluntarily waived all rights of non-disclosure to all banking institutions. The prosecution needs to establish a paper trail.

    4. don’t forget,ur asking how these big weapons came into liberia,there were also foreighners doing husiness here as well,not disputing that taylor might not hav been smugglin or doing his blood daimond,but gus kowenhoven was also charged for smugglin arm,plus there were other int’l companies in d country as well,taylor named them earlier in his trial,even if taylor should be persecuted,lets get the stories straight

  3. Jilay,
    To all those who say remain objective. I think I am using my experience on what happened and what I saw living next to Taylor;s house to make a judgement about his character and whether or not he is guilty of what happens in Sierra Leone. The prosecution have their witnesses from Sierra Leone to testify that Taylor infact was involved in the war in Sierra Leone, now if I was a prosecutor, which I will be by God’s grace, I will use Taylor’s reputation in Liberia to prove that he is indeed a wicked man and he is capable of killing and committing horrible atrocities.
    What am i say. DON’T tell me to be objective when I’ve seen with my eyes what Taylor has done!!! If I’m looking at this case from the outside and have no clue about Mr. Taylor’s Character, than i can remain objective and let the court judge him. But as a 6, 7 year old girl I’ve seen Taylor’s “hand-work”, for lack of better words. I’m not a fan of Taylor as you can tell I’m not a supporter so there is not objectiveness in the whole matter of how i feel. The court needs to be objective and let the prosecutor and defense make their case, then, declare a ruling at the end of the trail. But a Liberian citizen like me, who went to school with his children, who saw his evil with my eyes. I don’t remain objective. Go and asked the mother of those children soldiers in the mass graves on Bernard beach, Bassa Buchana beaches to be objective.
    I give my “highly emotional” opinions of Charles Taylor, “my brother” with out apologies.

    My opinion has nothing to do with the criminal justice system being underminded. Everyone is indeed “Innocent” until proven guilty. Taylor proved himself guilty in my eyes when i saw the things he did, I SAW, not heard, the things he did. My opinion in now way shape or form reflects what the courts should or should not do. I believe in the justice system taking it’s course and finding a man guilty or innocent. So please don’t be mis-informed that my opinions mean that I do not trust the justice system or I’m not for the justice system. I’m just a young woman who speak her mind and have opinions based on my experiences living through Three civil wars. That is why it’s my OPINION!
    Do I know for sure how Taylor brought weapons into Liberia, No not really but as i said i have my own opinion of the events of things in Liberia and Sierra Leone based on the reading and research I’ve done about Sierra Leone and Liberia, so whatever I say is based on that. Do I admit that i don’t have all the facts or a lot of the facts for that matter, absolutely but I’m opinions about things stay the same. The entire truth of How Taylor and others received arms and their killing spree may come out in the future or it may not but I am convinced that my opinions of Taylor Character is 100% correct. MY EYES NEVER LIE. And what i saw in Gbanga with my eyes will always remain the TRUTH.

Comments are closed.